Leicester on People Who Don’t Understand How Real Business Works (aka Crypto Bubble / Marks) [COLORFUL LANGUAGE WARNING]

Leicester on People Who Don’t Understand How Real Business Works (aka Crypto Bubble / Marks) [COLORFUL LANGUAGE WARNING]
Crypto Talk Radio: Basic Cryptonomics
Leicester on People Who Don’t Understand How Real Business Works (aka Crypto Bubble / Marks) [COLORFUL LANGUAGE WARNING]

Oct 26 2025 | 00:20:48

/
Episode October 26, 2025 00:20:48

Hosted By

Leicester

Show Notes

Leicester on People Who Don’t Understand Real Business Works (aka Crypto Bubble / Marks)

#Crypto #Cryptocurrency #podcast #BasicCryptonomics #Kaspa #BlockDAG

Website: ⁠⁠⁠⁠https://www.CryptoTalkRadio.net⁠⁠⁠⁠

Facebook: ⁠⁠⁠⁠@ThisIsCTR⁠⁠⁠⁠

Discord:⁠⁠⁠⁠ @CryptoTalkRadio⁠⁠⁠⁠

Chapters

  • (00:00:00) - Before You Start: CryptoTalk FM Preface
  • (00:00:34) - The Crypto Bubble
  • (00:03:18) - Mark Leister on Muhammad's
  • (00:07:07) - DAGcoin Has Not Changed the Token Balance
  • (00:11:05) - Mark Duguay on
  • (00:15:32) - Mark Leister on Reid Mark's
  • (00:19:05) - Reed Attacks MT41000 For Being Critical Of The Project
View Full Transcript

Episode Transcript

[00:00:00] Out of Cycle Update. [00:00:03] The crypto bubble is a powerful thing, folks. CryptoTalk FM. My name is Leister. I'm your host. [00:00:09] I'm gonna give a preface. The preface is this. Leister at CryptoTalks FM is a podcaster. [00:00:16] Podcasts is what I do. Not for a living. I got my own business, J O B. The business owns the podcast, it owns the show. [00:00:26] The show is diverse. We have multiple different shows and ultimately we are a business. [00:00:32] We conduct business. [00:00:34] There is a flaw in crypto and it's been a flaw. This is not new. It's been there for years and doesn't change and it's mind boggling. And I'm going to hit you with a time machine because I want you to understand why I call it the crypto bubble. Because you might not have heard the term. That's what I'm gonna do here. That's my short here today. It's not really a short, but you get what I'm saying. [00:00:54] The crypto bubble. [00:00:56] What is it? [00:00:57] It's this mythical yet factual surround that encircles people who don't think the way real businesses act. They think the way that crypto somehow acts differently somehow insulates and protects them from the realities of business. That's crypto bubble. So if you're the kind of person that thinks that the Block Dag team, for example, I'm only picking on them because this is the immediate. [00:01:25] You think that the Block Dag team, Nick Vander, idiot at all. [00:01:30] It's let them do their work. Let them do their work. You don't care that they're not transparent. I'm talking on their website. [00:01:37] You don't care that they got fake faulty marketing. You don't care that they've lied to you multiple times. You don't care that their CEO claims to not know a damn thing. [00:01:46] You don't care that their Guran Kijos name is floating around somehow a bannable offense. And they're so. You don't care about all these red flags. You just don't care. It's just give them time. Whatever. Give them time. Can we just move on? If you're that you're in the crypto bubble. But the thing is, there's more to the crypto bubble than just those naysayers because you also have what I refer to as marks that you may have heard the term. If you're new, by the way, welcome. But if you're not, you've heard me refer to certain people in your communities as marks. [00:02:20] A mark is Somebody who just blindly. You're just going with shit. You might even say in private, I don't like this. I don't like the duh. [00:02:30] You don't understand how transparency works. And that is part of the problem and why your communities, plural, are turning against your projects because there's a lack of transparency. Because in the crypto bubble, they don't think they should be transparent. [00:02:47] Binance stuff. Who has an amazing channel and amazing coverage. I don't always agree with what he says. It doesn't matter because I respect his coverage to the nth. He's straight line with what he's saying. He will tell you the red flag, red flag, red flag, red flag, red flag, red flag. When you're the kind of person who just dismisses those red flags and you keep muscling forward. You've every right to ignore what he's saying. But don't say they're not red flags. They are red flags. And don't just say it privately, say it publicly. My beef with CEO Reed, the mark and Chanel and now Muhammad, who I will now call a mark henceforth and forthwith, he is now a mark because he's confirmed himself to be a mark by way of his action recently. I'll talk about regardless of what Muhammad has to say about it. I can talk about an interaction that I had with Muhammad. It's his fault for reaching out to the channel. He. Because if he didn't want to put it public, he shouldn't have said a damn thing. So now you put yourself in the mark list because unfortunately, here's what Muhammad believes. Muhammad believes. He says that he doesn't want to try to change somebody's mind, that he wants to try to understand the concerns. I don't know if anybody else is paying attention. If there's one thing Leister's done repeatedly, consistently, is put out concerns on a frequent basis to the point I had somebody respond and. And say, you really gotta stop putting up so much block that coverage. So how is it then that somehow Muhammad is confused about what my concerns are when I have countless videos and uploads, audio only, with screens that outline the concerns with evidence backing that I've done on a repeated basis? Because, folks, that's not Muhammad's motivation. Muhammad's motivation is not to understand the concerns, despite what he says in private. [00:04:40] You're like, how do you know that? Because Muhammad doesn't want to put his concerns public. [00:04:45] See, as a podcaster, I have a saying. I want to smoke. I invite people to talk to me on a public channel. I invite anybody who thinks that they can contradict what I'm saying with data to come at me and let's put it public. Because I believe that the community has every right to hear what's being said about their project because their money is at stake with what said. If the things I'm saying are false and you can prove it with data, I stand down. Nobody's been able to do that. Instead, you just got Nick Vander idiot talking about, can we just move on? We got to get rid of all the negatives and all this. [00:05:21] You got Reed, who's getting attacked by the very community. [00:05:25] You got people claiming about assassins and shit. And mine is to simply call out these things. I'm calling out what I see. If you don't want it called out, don't put it up public. [00:05:36] That's transparency. When you put it public, it's fair game. I can talk about it. I can share an opinion about it. You can't do a damn thing about it. That goes to Reed Mark, that goes to Chanel Mark, that goes to Muhammad Mark, that goes to Nick Vander, idiot. Because I don't give a damn about your hurt feelings. I don't give a about why ever you're trying to do sketchy business. I don't give a. [00:05:59] I am transparent. [00:06:01] I do a podcast. I am happy to have an open conversation and share what was talked about in an open forum. Unlike some of you mother fathers who say, quote, this came from Chanel Mark, quote, reed is challenging them behind the scenes. Why is it that the community can't see what Reed's doing? Then on the AMA we just had, which wasn't really an AMA because Nick Vander idiot at a point got frustrated and said, we got stuff I need to cover, and I know it's an ama, which basically says they had no intention of answering your damn questions. They just want to tell you shit. They don't want to answer questions back. They don't want to smoke back. Adam. Okay, reads just reading shit, no pun intended. And people in the chat are just basically saying, dude, I quoted straight off the chat. Because it's public, people are saying, read, ask the question. Stop being a puss. They said that. I didn't. I'm just saying persons who are your advocates are challenging the problems publicly, not allegedly doing it in private, and likely soft touching. Consider if Reid were actually doing what Chanel said, why didn't anything change if these things about the oversell of tokens actually happen, how is it that they now are coming out with it and are still doing the pre sell shit. Nick Vander idiot said that they changed the token allocations. I didn't see that that was the case. Did you? I haven't checked in the last hour. I'll go ahead and check right now as I'm recording this. But as of the last I checked, they hadn't changed it. So why then did Nick say that they did? You have to understand how simple this is. [00:07:41] It all goes to transparency of what somebody says in public. Everything I'm talking about is that was said in public. I'm not talking to anybody in private. I'm talking openly and in public about what the is going on. [00:07:54] As of right now, I don't see that the token balance has changed. I don't see that they truly address the issue unless if their mitigation is something different or they haven't done it yet. If they haven't done it yet, that's fine. Then why did Nick Vander idiot say they did? Do you understand this is easy? We're, we're not making this up. You can go yourself and look at the token supply if you're bought into the project. Did your go down? Some people said it did. I just looked. I don't see that the token, the balance for the bonus, I don't see it's gone down. So how is it possible yours went down? If it's true that they did change it, why is it not consistent throughout the site, which I'm talking about? Transparency, public transparency. [00:08:38] Anybody who wants to chat with me, number one, when you reach out, this is education 101. When you reach out to a business, business records are open records. They're open records because if there is something that is subject to a lawsuit, those records are fair game to support the lawsuit in discovery. That's how it's always been. However, a podcaster can discuss anything the they want to. Megyn Kelly just did it. Candace Owens just did it. Alex Jones does it on a regular basis. Countless people online talk about emails that they've gotten. What we're not able to do is something that borders on the line of slander or libel. What's the difference? Slander is verbal. Libel is written. In both situations, it has to be provably untrue. It has to be that the person knew that was untrue and there has to be provable damages. [00:09:32] None of these are the case. So when Muhammad reaches out and this is public, it's on YouTube, he reaches out allegedly to have a Conversation. And as part of the conversation, I give back a term that says, no problem. But some of that audio is fair game for the podcast because I can talk about what was said. Why? Because I, unlike the marks in your midst, want the community to hear what was said on both sides. Because I don't have to hide. I want them to hear what I said. I want them to hear what these guys said so that it's open. It's transparent. I get it. You marks are afraid of the block DAG team blocking you out because of shit that you say. And that's why you want it private, so that you can kind of keep your shit going. That's fine. Then you're not compatible with me, which I already said as a reason I likely would never be on Reed Mark's channel. Because again, if I go on there, there is no censorship. There is no filtration. I say whatever the fuck I want. I'm a straight shooter in the world of sensitivity. And people are going to need to grow a pair and get over it. Because this is how I am. This is how I grow. I see Muhammad's young dude, okay? I'm probably twice his age. I got it, okay. These young cats, they don't understand that. They don't understand the hit, the hard hit, how the real world works. That's why they get smoked and run over all the fucking time. Because they've never been talked to the way I'm coming at them. I wouldn't come at them this way except he tried to play boss. S talking about what rights he has. When you contact a business, you have no fucking rights. You reached out to me. You proactively initiated contact. The records are open records. I don't give a damn what you got to say about it. I can talk about the interaction. You have no rights about me talking about said interaction because you can prove no harm about me talking about the fact that you reached out when you reached out publicly. Motherfucker. [00:11:32] Yes, I said that. And I don't like doing that. But I'm tired of marks in your midst. [00:11:38] I'm tired of the marks. I'm sick of it. I like people who are straight up in a DCC exp. [00:11:46] That's an advocate. MT 41,000, that's an advocate. Those are the people that I like. They're challenging it. They're straight up. They're calling it like it is. They're right down the middle. Angel Rodriguez, I think, is another one. You got someones who are right down the middle and they call it like it is publicly, openly, not trying to creep in shadows like these numb nuts. I don't play that shit. I don't and I don't give a damn what you got to say about it. When you are ready to grow a pair and grow up and actually act like adults and have some courage behind you, all you got to do is reach out. But you understand we are not doing this shit where we're doing shit in private so that you can go back and make false claims about what was said, then try to come at me and play boss s when I'm the business that you reached out to. You will not do that. You will come correct, show respect when you're reaching to me, which means you play by my rules. You're in my house. When you reach out to me in my house, my rules apply. You play by my rules or you say, I don't want to play by those rules. Let's just not have the conversation. Great. No problem. Then I can tell your community you duck the smoke because that's what happened. That's shady. Your community understands that. Your community understands that it's shady as fuck that people would not want to have anything put public that they said we're just having a conversation. According to your outreach, it's just a conversation allegedly aligned in the intent to support the community. [00:13:16] Then why is it that one side of us is fair game to put shit out for the community to hear, but the rest of you are not? No matter what, you marks are going to keep on getting attacked by your own community because you don't understand. You're all young. [00:13:31] You all young cats. And you don't understand the real business. You don't understand the real game here. You don't understand how this has to work. And until you grow up, you're going to have a hard time. That's great. [00:13:43] Go play in your sandbox on Reed Mark's channel. That's why he created it, to have a group think sandbox off to the side where you could just cheer and your community can sit back and watch as you guys are feckless and ineffective at trying to get them the course correct. Fine. I never once said ever said anything up to the point that they admitted they were scamming. I had never said anything other than I got an X30. I'll try it. Assuming I get it. I don't think I'm gonna get it, but we'll see what the happens. And then. Okay, we're doing these other coverages because I see they're doing crazy. [00:14:20] Fine. [00:14:21] Don't tell me you don't know what my concerns are because that then you're lying, talking about you listen to the show when there's no way you could have. Because my concerns are clear. Crystal clear. To the point I've got more people spreading the word around. And those people, if they're listening to this one, I'm going to encourage you. Scam Alert by Fetra Amazing channel. Allegedly he got two suspicious copyright strikes, just like I did. So he's getting attacked, which I predicted would happen. Binance stuff is an amazing channel. Binance stuff is a larger advocate than even I am. Binance stuff has done more coverage than I've done. Binance stuff is arguably more straight line than I am. I'm just reading what I see and providing my thoughts on what I see. And I'm going to be terse in my opinion, because I don't like marks in your midst. Binance stuff is a lot more. I don't say cordial, but he's a lot more mindful about those people's feelings. And that's great. I. All channels, all three of these. You should. There's a couple of others. I'll call those out over time because I want you to get an exposure to multiple different perspectives. And then you make a choice as to who's telling you the truth and who's lying to you. Is it true that Reid Mark's telling you the truth? I'm sure there's shit he's telling you the truth about. I'm also sure there's shit he's not telling you the truth about. Because again, why would he not want to have these conversations put out public? Why is all this criticism the true criticism, not the softballs not put out public? Why is it that Nick Vander idiots ducking questions, pretending like he doesn't know it's an ama, trying to move on past shit that means there's shit you don't know. That means they're shipping withheld from you and they're on the inside. Muhammad's on the inside, reads on the inside. Are we seriously suggesting they didn't know some of this shit? Maybe they didn't. I doubt that they didn't. Chances are they don't want to alienate the team because that's what they said to Binance stuff they said they don't want to piss them off. They don't want. [00:16:17] Okay. That means their shit being hidden from you. And I want you independently to decide what's acceptable. Is it acceptable that shits be withheld from you. If is it acceptable that shit's being hidden from you as your money's on the stake here, people. [00:16:31] Allegedly. There's another AMA come this next Friday. [00:16:34] Will it be an AMA or will it be once again Nick Vander, idiot? Basically, just, we're going to read what we want to raid again. We're not answering the questions, not answering the crucials they claimed in this last ama. They're going to accept criticism. Have you seen any evidence, say course correct? I want you to measure them over this next week. Have you seen any evidence that they course correct? The only way they're going to course correct is that people like myself have to challenge them. And I would like people other than myself to challenge them. Binance stuff challenges them. Scam alert challenges them. How come the person who calls himself the CEO of Block Dag Investors is not openly, publicly challenging them? [00:17:16] How come Muhammad doesn't want to go on the air and publicly challenge them? I want you to, in your mind, ask yourself that question and come up with your own answer, because you're going to come to the same resolution that I did, which is that people are hiding from you. They claim they're not, but it's the only logical answer. How can it be that people inside are now all of a sudden afraid to go on the public air and talk to Leister and have it publicly on the podcast so. So that everybody can hear the same message at the same time? How could it be that they don't want to do that? How can it be, Honestly, how could it be that a subset of people in your own midst, community, are the same private shit that the team is? And yet when. When I say I think people are on the inside, people are shaking their head. Make it make sense, folks. Make it make sense. Meanwhile, Muhammad, I don't like calling you a mark, dude, because I actually think you're a nice person. But you're a mark because if you're ducking smoke, which is what you're doing, you're ducking smoke. You have an opportunity here. You have an opportunity, Reid. Mark has an opportunity. You have an opportunity to defray the narrative. You got to understand that AMA exposed you guys because your own community was attacking you. I didn't have to be there. It was a beautiful fucking thing. You have an opportunity. You still have an opportunity to defray that. You have an opportunity to actually show that you represent the community. You have an opportunity to stand forward. [00:18:50] What you're not going to do, what you're not going to do is make a statement that Leister is somehow misrepresenting shit. Because there's been nothing I've misrepresented. Nothing. Chanel is a mark. She came back as a mark. Multiple people have already confirmed the same shit. Reed is a mark. His own screenshots on his own video confirmed Leister tried to help the dude and he attacked him. Reed already attacked MT41000. Reed attacks anybody that's critical of him. That makes him a mark. Nothing that I've said is misrepresented. Everything is the truth. People that are marks, people that are improperly defensive of what appears to be a clear scam, you lose your right to talk on the channel if you come at it neutral. You know what licers calling it straight. This is scammy. This is scummy. Nick's a fucking idiot. You come it straight, I leave it alone. There are people on my channel that are still, quote, bullish about the project. I leave them alone because they're not marks. They understand, but they're hopeful, they're optimistic. And they don't come at it like Reid Mark, talking about views and likes and shit like a child. [00:19:58] You come correct, you're talking to a business. [00:20:01] Could you imagine? You call up your fucking utility company and you tell them, I'm making more money than you do. [00:20:08] That's a mark. That's marked behavior you're calling a business. [00:20:13] You need to learn how to act. You're young. I get it. You're young. You're kids compared to me. I'm going to educate you on how you need to act. And until you act straight, you. You lose the privilege of talking on my show, however I said it. Just like Reid Mark. All you gotta do is reach out, acknowledge what the fuck you got wrong, apologize what the fuck you got wrong. Course correct. Understand, you're reaching to a business. And I run the game. Play by my rules. Boom. Everything's fair game. All you gotta do is stop being a mark. If you don't want to stop being a mark. Hey, that's all you, Boo Boo.

Other Episodes